Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya • ISSN 2075-7999
peer-reviewed • open access journal
      

 

Shukova G.V. Modern research trends in perceptual psychology


SHUKOVA G.V. MODERN RESEARCH TRENDS IN PERCEPTUAL PSYCHOLOGY
Full text in Russian: Шукова Г.В. Современные исследовательские тенденции в области психологии восприятия

Psychological institute, Moscow, Russia

About author
Suggested citation


Modern perceptual psychology can be characterized by an increasing trend towards the formation of ontological research approach. We can observe intensive methodological search conducted in two directions: the subject of research and the object of research. It is shown that the ontologization of the subject of psychological perceptual research is aimed at the revelation of natural principles that psychic reality is based on. The transformation of the subject of perceptual research, i.e., the emphasis on its existential aspect is an effective means to increase the ontological correctness of psychological knowledge that is to correspond to the life it studies, as well as to discover deeper and more essential levels of the psychic reality organization. By using extensive empirical material, we illustrate the recent interest in fundamental study of "new" perceptual reality as one of the ways of development of modern scientific knowledge. The relevant problem of searching for opportunities to analyze an individual’s activity under natural conditions is solved in perceptual psychology by means of formation of a certain research direction in which "natural processes" are used as objects of fundamental psychological research. Rigorous study of real stimuli lets us see new perceptual patterns that haven’t been registered before and thus pose new research problems concerning the integrity of perception and its accordance with nature.

Keywords: ontological approach to perceptual psychology research, perceptual process, psychic reality, empirical research, ecological validity

 

Funding
The study was supported by Russian Foundation for Humanities, project 16-00574.


References

Amit E., Greene J.D. You see, the ends don’t justify the means visual imagery and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 2012, 23(8), 861–868.

Barabanshchikov V.A. Vospriyatie i sobytie. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya, 2002. (in Russian)

Barabanshchikov V.A. Ekspressii litsa i ikh vospriyatie. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2012. (in Russian)

Baranowski A.M., Hecht H. The Big Picture: Effects of Surround on Immersion and Size Perception. Perception, 2014, 43(10), 1061–1070. doi:10.1068/p7663.

Bernshtein N.A. In: V.P. Zinchenko (Ed.), Biomekhanika i fiziologiya dvizhenii. Moscow: Institut prakticheskoi psikhologii, 1997. pp. 342–460. (in Russian)

Cañal-Bruland R., Pijpers J.R., Oudejans R.R.D. Close, and a Cigar! – Why Size Perception Relates to Performance. Perception, 2012, 41(3), 354–356. doi:10.1068/p7255.

Cottrell D., Campbell M.E.J. Auditory Perception of a Human Walker. Perception, 2014, 43(11), 1225–1238. doi:10.1068/p7669.

Dorosheva E.A. Eksperimental'naya Psikhologiya, 2014, 7(3), 83–97. (in Russian)

Engel A.K., Maye A., Kurthen M., König P. Where's the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2013, 17(5), 202–209. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.006.

Freeman J.B., Johnson K.L. More Than Meets the Eye: Split-Second Social Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2016, 20(5), 362–374.

Gantman A.P., Van Bavel J.J. See for Yourself: Perception Is Attuned to Morality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2016, 20(2), 76–77.

Jones A.L., Kramer R.S.S. Facial Cosmetics Have Little Effect on Attractiveness Judgments Compared with Identity. Perception, 2015, 44(1), 79–86. doi:10.1068/p7904.

Koenderink J. The all seeing eye? Perception, 2014, 43(1), 1–6.

Kornmeier J., Mayer G. The Alien in the Forest OR When Temporal Context Dominates Perception. Perception, 2014, 43(11), 1270–1274. doi:10.1068/p7844.

Mandelbrot B.B. The fractal geometry of nature. New York, NY: Freeman, 1982.

Meshcheryakov B.G., Yushchenkova D.V. In: V.A. Barabanshchikov (Ed.), Sovremennaya eksperimental'naya psikhologiya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2011. Vol. 2, pp. 145–163. (in Russian)

Olson J.A., Amlani A.A., Rensink R.A. Perceptual and Cognitive Characteristics of Common Playing Cards. Perception, 2012, 41(3), 268–286. doi:10.1068/p7175.

Parrott S., Guzman-Martinez E., Ortega L., Grabowecky M., Huntington M.D., Suzuki S. Spatial Position Influences Perception of Slope from Graphs. Perception, 2014, 43(7), 647–653. doi:10.1068/p7758.

Pyankova S.D. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2016, 9(46), 12. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian)

Rose D., Brown D. Idealism and Materialism in Perception. Perception, 2015, 44(4), 423–435. doi:10.1068/p7927.

Sergienko E.A. In: A.L. Zhuravlev, T.D. Martsinkovskaya, A.V. Yurevich (Eds.), Progress psikhologii: Kriterii i priznaki. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2009. pp. 319–333. (in Russian)

Teufel C., Fletcher P.C., Davis G. Seeing other minds: attributed mental states influence perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2010, 14(8), 376–382.

Tyler C. Review: Possibilities of Perception. Perception, 2014, 43(4), 353–354. doi:10.1068/p4304rvw.

Walker P. Cross-Sensory Correspondences and Naive Conceptions of Natural Phenomena. Perception, 2012, 41(5), 620–622. doi:10.1068/p7195.

Zinchenko V.P. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2008, No. 3, 3–10. (in Russian)

Received 16 July 2016. Date of publication: 30 December 2016.

About author

Shukova GalinaV. Ph.D., Psychological Institute, ul. Mokhovaya, 9–4, 125009 Moscow, Russia.
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Suggested citation

Shukova G.V. Modern research trends in perceptual psychology. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2016, Vol. 9, No. 50, p. 9. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian, abstr. in English).

Permanent URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2016v9n50e/1372-shukova50e.html

Back to top >>

Related Articles