Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya • ISSN 2075-7999
peer-reviewed • open access journal
      

 

Sokolova E.T., Ivanishchuk G.A. The problem of conscious and unconscious manipulations

Full text in Russian: Соколова Е.Т., Иванищук Г.А. Проблема сознательной и бессознательной манипуляции
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

About authors
Suggested citation


Phenomenological and theoretical diversity of approaches to manipulation is considered. The control over an individual (controlled behavior) without regard to his/her own emotions and needs is a common theme within these approaches. The key criterion of distinction which determines manipulation pragmatic effects, satiable needs, behavior strategies and their relatedness to ethical norms is conscious or unconscious character of manipulations. Machiavellianism as a system of conscious attitudes and corresponding manipulative strategies is based on instrumental needs whereas projective identification as an archaic defense form of manipulation relates to vital needs and in this sense is beyond the frames of ethical systems. However, the excessiveness of both conscious and unconscious forms of manipulation indicates an inner misbalance: based on different studies data, Machiavellianism is related to the whole complex of dysfunctional traits while projective identification as a primitive mechanism is a part of borderline personality structure.

Keywords: manipulation, machiavellianism, projective identification

 

References

Ali F., Chamorro-Premuzic T. Investigating Theory of Mind deficits in nonclinical psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 2010a, 49(3), 169–174. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.027

Ali F., Chamorro-Premuzic T. The dark side of love and life satisfaction: Associations with intimate relationships, psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 2010b, 48(2), 228–233. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.016

Ali F., Ines S., Chamorro-Premuzic T. Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009, 47(7), 758–762. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.016

Aronson E., Pratkanis A. Epokha propagandy: mekhanizmy ubezhdeniya, povsednevnoe ispol'zovanie i zloupotreblenie. St. Petersburg: Praim-Evroznak, 2003. (in Russian)

Balint M. Bazisnyi defekt: Terapevticheskie aspekty regressii. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2002. (in Russian)

Bartels D.M., Pizarro D.A. The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 2011, 121(1), 154–161. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010

Beavin J., Jackson D., Watzlawick P. Psikhologiya mezhlichnostnykh kommunikatsii. St. Petersburg: Rech', 2000. (in Russian)

Bion W.R. Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock Publications, 1961.

Blatt S.J., Blass R.B. Interpersonal Relatedness and Self-Definition: Two Basic Dimensions in Personality Development and Psychopathology. In: Development and Vulnerabilities in Close Relationships, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.

Carlin F. The art of influence. Psychology Today, 2011, 44(5), 64–69.

Carruthers Р. How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2009, 32(2), 121–138. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000545

Côté S., Decelles K.A., McCarthy J.M., Van Kleef G.A., Hideg I. The Jekyll and Hyde of emotional intelligence: emotion-regulation knowledge facilitates both prosocial and interpersonally deviant behavior. Psychological Science, 2011, 22(8), 1073–1080. doi:10.1177/0956797611416251

Den Hartog D.N., Belschak F.D. Work Engagement and Machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, 107(1), 35–47. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1296-4

Dotsenko E.L. Psikhologiya manipulyatsii: fenomeny, mekhanizmy i zashchita. Moscow: Rech', 2003. (in Russian)

Druzhinin A.M. PhD dissertation (Philosophy). Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2005. (in Russian)

Dunbar R.I.M. Putting humans in their proper place. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2006, 29(1), 15–16. doi:10.1017/S0140525X06259016

Egorova M.S. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagigicheskogo universiteta. Ser. 10, Differentsial'naya psikhologiya, 2009, No. 1/2, 65–80. (in Russian)

Fehr B., Samsom D., Paulhus D.L. The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In: C.D. Spielberger, J.N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment. Routledge, 1992, Vol. 9, pp. 77–116.

Freedenthal S. Challenges in assessing intent to die: can suicide attempters be trusted? Omega: The Journal of Death and Dying, 2007, 55(1), 53–70.

Further M.R., Rauthmann J.F., Sachse P. The self-loving self-leader: an examination of the relationship between self-leadership and the Dark triad. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 2011, 39 (3), 369–379. doi:10.2224/sbp.2011.39.3.369

Hamilton J.D., Decker N., Rumbaut R.D. The manipulative patient. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 1986, 40(2), 189–200.

Hartman F.G.H., Maas V.S. Why business unit controllers create budget slack: involvement in management, social pressure, and Machiavellianism. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2010, 22(2), 27–49. doi:10.2308/bria.2010.22.2.27

Hinshelwood R. Slovar' klyainianskogo psikhoanaliza. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2007. (in Russian)

Jones D.N., Paulhus D.L. Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social and Personality Psychology Science, 2010a, 1(1), 12–18.

Jones D.N., Paulhus D.L. Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In: L.M. Horowitz, S.N. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic Interventions. New York: Guilford, 2010b. pp. 249–267. doi:10.1002/9781118001868.ch15

Jones D.N., Paulhus D.L. The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 2011, 51(5), 679–682. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.011

Jones M. The Modern Prince: better living through Machiavellianism. CreateSpace, 2007.

Kara-Murza S.G. Manipulyatsiya soznaniem. Moscow: Eksmo, 2003. (in Russian)

Kernberg O. Moskovskii psikhoterapevticheskii zhurnal, 1997, No. 3, 131–150. (in Russian)

Klein M. In: Razvitie v psikhoanalize. Moscow: Akad. proekt, 2001. (in Russian)

Kohut H. Vosstanovlenie samosti. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 2002. (in Russian)

Kohyar K., Restubog S.L., Zagenczyk T.J., Kiewitz Ch., Tang R.L. In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 2010, 44(4), 512–519. doi:0.1016/j.jrp.2010.06.004

Lawrence E., Shaw P., Baker D., Baron-Cohen S., David A. Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 2004, 34(5), 911–919.

Malinowski C. The relationship between Machiavellianism and undergraduate student attitudes about hypothetical marketing moral dilemmas. Competitiveness Review, 2009, 19(5), 398–408. doi:10.1108/10595420910996019

McHoskey J.W., Worzel W.Q., Szyarto C. Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(1), 192–210. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.192

McWilliams N. Psikhoanaliticheskaya diagnostika: ponimanie lichnostnoi struktury v klinicheskom protsesse. Moscow: Klass, 1998. (in Russian)

Pandey J., Singh A.K. Attribution and evaluation of manipulative social behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 1986, 126(6), 735–745.

Potter N.N. What is manipulative behavior, anyway? Journal of Personality Disorders, 2006, 20(2), 139–156. doi:10.1521/pedi.2006.20.2.139

Putnam K.M., Silk K.R. Emotion dysregulation and the development of borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 2005, Vol. 17, 899–925. doi:10.10170S0954579405050431

Robins R.W., Paulhus D.L., Delroy L. The character of self-enhancers: Implications for organizations. In: B.W. Roberts, R .Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace. Decade of behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2001. pp. 193–222. doi:10.1037/10434-008

Rosenfeld H. Zhurnal prakticheskoi psikhologii i psikhoanaliza, 2003, No. 3. http://spp.org.ru/page.php?id=4 (in Russian)

Saulsbury M.D., Brown U.J. III, Heyliger S.O., Beale R.L. Effect of dispositional traits on pharmacy students' attitude toward cheating. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2011, 75(4), 69.

Skinner N.F. Personality correlates of Machiavellianism, extraversion and toughmindness in business. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 1983, 11(1), 29–33. doi:10.2224/sbp.1982.10.2.201

Sokolova E.T. In: Osobennosti lichnosti pri pogranichnykh rasstroistvakh i somaticheskikh zabolevaniyakh. Moscow: Argus, 1995. pp. 27−206. (in Russian)

Sokolova E.T. Samosoznanie i samootsenka pri anomaliyakh lichnosti. Moscow: Mosk. gos. univ., 1989. (in Russian)

Sokolova E.T. Voprosy psikhologii, 2009, No. 1, 67−80. (in Russian)

Sokolova E.T., Chechelnitskaya E.P. Psikhologiya nartsissizma. Moscow: Psikhologiya, 2001. (in Russian)

Swami V., Chamorro-Premuzic T., Snelgar R., Furnham A. Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: A path analytic investigation of their determinants. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2010, 51(2), 139–145. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00760.x

Swami V., Chamorro-Premuzic T., Snelgar R., Furnham A. Personality, individual differences, and demographic antecedents of self-reported household waste management behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 31(1), 21–26. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.001

Thoma H., Kachele H. Sovremennyi psikhoanaliz: issledovaniya. St. Petersburg: VEIP, 2001. (in Russian)

Weber S. Organizational behaviour – Google corporate culture in perspective. Munich: GRIN Publishing, 2007. doi:10.3239/9783638017824

Zentsova N.I. Voprosy narkologii, 2009, No. 4, 66–73. (in Russian)

Znakov V.V. Voprosy psikhologii, 2002, No. 6, 45–54. (in Russian)

 Received 12 March 2013. Date of publication: 27 April 2013.

About authors

Sokolova Elena T. Ph.D., Professor, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, ul. Mokhovaya, 11, str. 9, 125009 Moscow, Russia.
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Ivanishchuk Galina A. Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, ul. Mokhovaya, 11, str. 9, 125009 Moscow, Russia.
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.

Suggested citation

Sokolova E.T., Ivanishchuk G.A. The problem of conscious and unconscious manipulations. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2013, Vol. 6, No. 28, p. 3. http://psystudy.ru (in Russian, abstr. in English).

Permanent URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/eng/2013v6n28e/793-sokolova28e.html

Back to top >>