Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya • ISSN 2075-7999
peer-reviewed • open access journal
      

 

Poddiakov A.N. Lie to a malefactor about a victim’s location, and polemics on the moral principle of truthfulness

Full text in Russian: Поддьяков А.Н. Ложь злоумышленнику о местонахождении жертвы и полемика о нравственном принципе правдивости
State University – Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

About author
Suggested citation


Russian researchers’ polemics on Kant’s essay “On a supposed right to tell lies from benevolent motives” in which Kant argues that if a malefactor (a murderer) who is going to kill a person’s friend asks that person where one’s friend is, the morality requires to tell the truth. It is proved in the paper that though Kantians are usually considered as “absolutists” and their opponents – as “relativists”, the Kantians perform a large-scale relativization of maxim of truthfulness and exhibit more conformity to lie than the “relativisits” do. Paradoxes “A Precious Friend” and “Kant’s Generalized Consequence for Many Friends” showing inconsistency and contradictoriness of Kantians’ point of view are introduced. The confrontation of “absolutists” and “relativists” is interpreted as a fundamental opposition of reductionism and holism followers, with understanding that in this case the opposition is many times strengthened by confrontation of moral values.

Keywords: Kant, lie, deception, truthfulness principle, ethics, moral absolutization and relativization, holism, reductionism

 

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Humanities, project 10-06-00322a.


References
Cyrillic letters are transliterated according to BSI standards. The titles are given in author’s translation [in square brackets].

Apressyan R.G
. Kommentarii k diskussii [Comments to the discussion] // Logos. 2008a. N 5. S. 196–197. [in Russian]

Apressyan R.G. O prave lgat' [On right to lie] // Logos. 2008b. N 5. S. 4–18. [in Russian]

Artemieva O.V. Ob opravdannosti lzhi iz chelovekolyubiya [On justifiability of lie from philanthropy] // Logos. 2008. N 5. S. 40–59. [in Russian]

Dubrovsky D.I K voprosu o dobrodetel'nom obmane [On virtuous deception] // Logos. 2008. N 5. S. 19–22. [in Russian]

Gloy K. Problema poslednego obosnovaniya dinamicheskikh sistem [The problem of final grounding for dynamical systems] // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. N 3. S. 94–105. [in Russian]

Guseinov A.A. Chto govoril Kant, ili Pochemu nevozmozhna lozh' vo blago [What Kant said, or Why lie for good is impossible] // Logos. 2008. N 5. S. 103–121. [in Russian]

Iskander F. Kroliki i udavy [Rabbits and boa constrictors]. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://lib.ru/FISKANDER/kroliki.txt (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

Kalinnikov L.A. Kant v russkoi filosofskoi kul'ture [Kant in Russian philosophical culture]. Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I.Kanta, 2005. 311 s. [in Russian]

Kant I. Lektsii po etike [Lectures on ethics]. M.: Respublika, 2005. 431 s. [in Russian]

Kant I. Metafizika nravov v dvukh chastyakh: chast’ I [Metaphysics of morals: part I] // I.Kant. Soch. v 6 t. T. 4, ch. 2. M.: Mysl', 1965. [in Russian]

Kant I. O mnimom prave lgat' iz chelovekolyubiya [On a supposed right to lie from philanthropy] // I.Kant. Traktaty i pis'ma / red. A.V.Gulyga. M.: Nauka, 1980. S. 232–237. URL: http://www.ethicscenter.ru/biblio/kant.html (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

Kapustin B.G. Kritika kantovskoi kritiki “prava lgat'” [Criticism of Kantian criticism of “right to lie”] // Logos. 2008. N 5. S. 122–143. [in Russian]

Kozeletsky J. Psikhologicheskaya teoriya reshenii [Psychological theory of decision-making]: per. s pol'sk. M.: Progress, 1979. 504 s. [in Russian]

Kuz’minov Ya.I., Yudkevich M.M. Kurs lektsii po institutsional'noi ekonomike [Lectures on institutional economics]: v 3 ch.  M.: GU-VShE, 2000. [in Russian]

Lefebvre V.A. Algebra sovesti [Algebra of Conscience]. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2003. 436 s. [in Russian]

Lefebvre V.A. Strategicheskie resheniya i moral' [Strategic decisions and morality] // Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie. 2002. T. 2. N 1. URL: http://www.reflexion.ru/Library/Lefebvre_2002_1.htm (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

Logos. 2008. N 5. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://www.prognosis.ru/logos/5_2008.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

MacIntyre A. Truthfulness and Lies: What Can We Learn from Kant // MacIntyre A. Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2006.

Malinetsky G.G. Liniya Urana [The line of Uranus] // Znanie – sila. 1996. N 8. S. 60. URL: http://www.znanie-sila.ru/news/issue2print_60.html (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

Merezhkovsky D.S. Stikhotvoreniya i poemy [Rhymes and poems]. SPb.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000. 928 s. [in Russian]

Poddiakov A. “Trojan horse” teaching in economic behavior [Electronic document] // Social Science Research Network. 2004. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=627432

Poddiakov A.N. Filosofiya obrazovaniya: problema protivodeistviya [The philosophy of education: the problem of counteraction] // Voprosy filosofii. 1999. N 8. S. 119–128. URL: http://hse.ru/data/884/913/1235/philosophy.doc (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

Poddiakov A.N. Orientirovochnaya i dezorientiruyushchaya osnovy deyatel'nosti: ierarkhii tselei obucheniya v konfliktuyushchikh sistemakh [Orienting and disorienting foundations of activity: A hierarchy of instruction objectives in conflicting system] // Voprosy psikhologii. 2002. N 5. S. 79–89. URL: http://hse.ru/data/956/913/1235/orientation.doc (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

Poddiakov A.N. Sravnitel'naya psikhologiya razvitiya Kh.Vernera v sovremennom kontekste [H.Werner’s comparative psychology in the modern context] [Elektronnyi resurs] // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2007. N 1. S. 63–71. URL: http://hse.ru/data/138/913/1235/sravnitel'naya_psikhologiya.doc (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

Prigogine I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz khaosa: novyi dialog cheloveka s prirodoi [Order out of Chaos: Man's new dialogue with nature]. M.: Progress, 1986. 432 s. [in Russian]

Prokofiev A.V. Kant, obman, primenenie sily… [Kant, deception, violence…] // Logos. 2008. N 5. S. 60–90. [in Russian]

Prokofiev A.V. Vybor v pol'zu men'shego zla i problema granits moral'no dopustimogo [Choice for lesser evil, and the problem of bounds of morally allowable] // Eticheskaya mysl'. Vyp. 9. M.: IFRAN, 2009. S. 122–145. [in Russian]

Rotenberg V.S. Obraz “Ya” i povedenie [Self-concept and behavior] [Elektronnyi resurs] // Sait psikhofiziologa Vadima Rotenberga. URL: http://rjews.net/v_rotenberg/book.htm (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

Ruzavin G.I. Kontseptsii sovremennogo estestvoznaniya [Conceptionsin modern natural sciences]. M.: Kul'tura i sport: YuNITI, 1999. 288 s. [in Russian]

Sidorova N.M. Kogda Kant budet uslyshan i skol'ko za eto nado zaplatit'? [When will Kant be heard, and How much will one have to pay for it?] // Logos. 2008. N 5. S. 179–187. [in Russian]

Skripnik A.P. K probleme lzhi v etike I.Kanta [On problem of lie in Kantian ethics] // Logos. 2008. N 5. S. 188–195. [in Russian]

Solovyov E.Yu. Chelovek pod doprosom (nelzhivost', pravdivost' i pravo na molchanie) [A person under interrogation (non-falsity, truthfulness, and right of silence)] // Logos. 2008. N 5. S. 23–34. [in Russian]

Vasiliev V.V. Marginalii k rabote Kanta o mnimom prave na lozh' [Marginalia to Kant’s essay about a supposed right to lie] // Logos. 2008. N 5. S. 144–150. [in Russian]

Yakovenko I. V chem oshibsya Khantington? (Monolog kul'torologa) [In what was Huntington wrong? Monologue by a cultural researcher] [Elektronnyi resurs] // Znanie – sila. 2002. N 1. S. 11–19. URL: http://www.znanie-sila.ru/online/issue_1520.html (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

Yaroshevsky M.G. Sotsial'nye i psikhologicheskie koordinaty nauchnogo tvorchestva [Social and psychological coordinates of scientific creativity] // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. N 12. S. 118–127. [in Russian]

Znakov V.V. Nepravda, lozh' i obman kak problemy psikhologii ponimaniya [Untruth, lie and deception as comprehension psychology problem] [Elektronnyi resurs] // Voprosy psikhologii. 1993. N 2. S. 9–16. URL: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1993/932/932009.htm (data obrashcheniya: 02.01.2010). [in Russian]

Zubets O.P. Lozh' kak samoustranenie [Lie as self-removal] // Logos. 2008. N 5. S. 91–102. [in Russian]

Received 18 December 2009. Available online 14 February 2010.

About author

Poddiakov Alexander N. Ph.D., Professor, Faculty of Psychology, State University – Higher School of Economics, ul. Myasnitskaya, 20, 101000 Moscow, Russia.
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.
Web-cтраница: http://new.hse.ru/C9/C18/poddyakov-a-n/default.aspx


Suggested citation

APA Style

Poddiakov, A. N. (2010). Lie to a malefactor about a victim’s location, and polemics on the moral principle of truthfulness. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 1(9). Retrieved from http://psystudy.ru. 0421000116/0001. [in Russian, abstr. in English].

Russian State Standard GOST P 7.0.5-2008
Poddiakov A.N. Lie to a malefactor about a victim’s location, and polemics on the moral principle of truthfulness [Electronic resource] // Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2010. N 1(9). URL: http://psystudy.ru (date of access: dd.mm.yyyy). 0421000116/0001. [in Russian, abstr. in English]

Back to top >>

Related Articles